Brief
communication about injectable fillers in aesthetic medicine (Part 1)
Dr Sky Wong
Dr Sky Wong
Introduction
Injectable filler by definition is a biocompatible material to be
injected to the cutaneous, subcutaneous, and periosteal layers for re-volumization
of the respective areas. In fact, with different properties of the fillers and
injection techniques, the treatment can result in reconditioning, restoring or
recontouring of the corresponding skin area and body part. It was first to be
used in lipodystrophy patient to improve the appearance and avoid
stigmatization[1].
The result was highly satisfied by the patients[2],
therefore it is further wide-spreadly adopted in aesthetic field at fast paces.
The applications can be from face to body parts like gluteal areas, from skin
to deep seated periosteal layers. The properties of a good soft tissue filler
are biocompatible, non-allergic inducing, integrative to soft tissues, good in
plasticity and elasticity, of adequate G-prime value, long lasting, low-cost, non-migratory
and easy to administer. However, there exists none for such ideal filler, so a
combination of fillers in a coherent approach with good knowledge of the fillers
properties is the utmost important to achieve an optimal effect in a safe way.
Filler choices and properties
There are numerous soft-tissue fillers across the world. The
commonly used ones which are discussed in this article include Hyaluronic acid (HA), Calcium
Hydroxylapatite (CaHA), Poly Lactic Acid (PLA), Polycaprolactone (PCL), Carboxymethylcellulose
(CMC), and Autologous fat.
Hyaluronic acid (HA)
HA is a temporary filler under the family of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
which is found abundant in our skin as extracellular matrix of various
molecular sizes. It is negatively charged and binds water molecules. It
provides numerous biological functions e.g. structural support, nutrient
diffusion, cell migration and proliferation etc. It is metabolized by
hydrolysis facilitated with hyaluronidase. In pharmaceutical manufacturing of
HA, it is by biochemical engineering using bacterial fermentation such as Streptococcus equi[3].
Low molecular size and non-cross-linked HA provides hydration and rejuvenation
function, while large molecular size and cross-linked HA gives more structural
support and lasts longer to exert re-volumization and recontouring functions.
They follow the rule of isovolumetric degradation in which HA molecules break
down and are then replaced by water molecules, theoretically it can maintain
its volume with time but results in less dense and less viscous texture
gradually. Although a number of HAs are approved by the FDA for wrinkles such
as nasolabial fold and face contour deficiencies, there are a lot of "off-label" uses like tear trough treatment, apple zone and temporal zone revolumization etc.
CaHA is a non-pyrogenic biocompatible inorganic bioceramic which is synthesized
through chemical deposition, biomimetic deposition, sol-gel route (wet-chemical
precipitation) or electrodeposition[4].
It is usually presented as semi-solid state in the form of 25-45μm microspheres
in a suspension of gel carrier with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) which gives immediate structural support.
It is biodegradable in the same metabolic pathway as our bone does and removed
by phagocytosis. Apart from being a filler and biostimulator, CaHA provides
support and scaffold lattice that guides fibroblast ingrowth for neocollagenesis/neoelastinogenesis
and promote surrounding soft tissue formation. Study also demonstrated
conversion of type III collagen to type I as well at 4th month and onwards[5].
It can provide different functional properties, G-primes and viscosities by
various degree of hyperdilutions, therefore it can be used in different areas and
indications from filler effect (i.e. tissue augmentation and re-volumization)
to biostimulator effect (i.e. collagen induction and rejuvenation)[6],[7].
(It is in a suspension of CMC to provide immediate volume effect.) The
longevity of CaHA is generally 12-18 months[8].
It is approved by FDA for moderate to severe wrinkles and folds (nasolabial
folds), facial augmentation and hand rejuvenation.
![]() |
Figure 1: The relatively uniform sized CaHA spheres, Courtesy of Holzapfel et al[9] |
Poly Lactic Acid (PLA)
This is a polymer of lactic acid from alpha-hydroxy-acid family which
can be derived from starch and is commercially prepared in L-enantiomer form (the
Poly L-Lactic Acid, PLLA) or racemic form. It is biocompatible, biodegradable
and can be fully metabolized to carbon dioxide and water. The PLA
microparticles (some pharmaceutical preparations are at the sizes from 40 to 63
μm) initiate neocollagenesis as a result of activation of fibroblasts[10].
It is reconstituted in sterile water with lignocaine and then injected to the
skin and soft tissue. It is advised to reconstitute at least 24 hours (best 72
hours) before use[11],
although the protocol differs in different preparations. Post-injection massage
was controversial or claimed to be possibly skipped in some commercial
preparations, but most studies tended to show massage reduced complication of
nodule formation and in general one should follow the rule of 5 (post-injection
for 5 days, 5 times a day, 5 minutes each time)[12].
The life span is up to 25 months[13]
to 3 years[14]. It
has been approved by FDA for restoration and correction of the signs of facial
fat loss, nasolabial folds and other facial wrinkles.
Polycaprolactone (PCL)
PCL is an organic aliphatic polyester belonging to the
poly-α-hydroxy acid group. It is bioabsorbable and hydrolytically degradable into
carbon dioxide and water[15].
Investigations also showed it is
non-cytotoxic, non-pyrogenic and biocompatible. Its biostimulator effect
induces collagen formation which results in filling effect. Similar to CaHA, it
also provides a scaffold for collagen infiltration which facilitates soft
tissue building and is prepared in a suspension of CMC to give adequate texture
and immediate effect after injection. The PCLs are made to microspheres at
25-50 µm sizes in some pharmaceutical preparations. The longevity of PCL
depends on the extensiveness of the polymer chain, officially from 1 – 4 years.
Before injection, PCL can be mixed with lignocaine for the comfort of patient
during injection. Its parental PCL medical devices (like suture materials) are
FDA approved, but not the injectable PCL itself at present moment. Actually, there
are studies including randomized controlled trials demonstrate its efficacy and
safety[16].
(to be continued)
Dr Sky Wong
Hong Kong
[1] Gooderham, Melinda, and Nowell Solish. "Use of hyaluronic acid
for soft tissue augmentation of HIV‐associated facial lipodystrophy."
Dermatologic surgery 31.1 (2005): 104-108.
[2] Sturm, Lana P., et al. "A systematic review of permanent and
semipermanent dermal fillers for HIV-associated facial lipoatrophy." AIDS
patient care and STDs 23.9 (2009): 699-714.
[3] Chong, Barrie Fong, et al. "Microbial hyaluronic acid
production." Applied microbiology and biotechnology 66.4 (2005): 341-351.
[4] Ferraz M, Monteiro F, Manuel C. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: a
review of preparation methodologies. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and
Biomechanics. 2004;2(2):74-80.
[5] Yutskovskaya YA, Kogan EA. Improved Neocollagenesis and Skin
Mechanical Properties After Injection of Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite in the
Neck and Décolletage: A Pilot Study. Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD.
2017;16(1):68-74.
[6] Hevia, Oscar. "A retrospective review of calcium
hydroxylapatite for correction of volume loss in the infraorbital region."
Dermatologic Surgery 35.10 (2009): 1487-1494.
[7] Range, Product, Image Skin Care, and Beauty Tips. "The CO2
laser is the most resourceful laser in the management of cutaneous lesions. It
is the gold standard amongst all ablative lasers. Potential applications of
this laser in day to day dermatological practice are boundless."
[8] Tzikas, Thomas L. "Evaluation of the Radiance FN soft tissue
filler for facial soft tissue augmentation." Archives of facial plastic
surgery 6.4 (2004): 234-239.
[9] Holzapfel AM, Mangat DS, Barron DS. Soft-tissue augmentation with
calcium hydroxylapatite: histological analysis. Archives of facial plastic
surgery. 2008;10(5):335-8.
[10] Simamora, Pahala, and Wendy Chern. "Poly-L-lactic acid: an
overview." Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD 5.5 (2006): 436-440.
[11] Narins, Rhoda S. "Minimizing adverse events associated with
poly‐L‐lactic acid injection." Dermatologic Surgery 34 (2008): S100-S104.
[12] Palm, Melanie D., et al. "Cosmetic use of poly‐l‐lactic acid:
a retrospective study of 130 patients." Dermatologic Surgery 36.2 (2010):
161-170.
[13] Narins, Rhoda S., et al. "A randomized study of the efficacy
and safety of injectable poly-L-lactic acid versus human-based collagen implant
in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles." Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology 62.3 (2010): 448-462.
[14] Salles, A. G., et al. "Evaluation of the poly-L-lactic acid
implant for treatment of the nasolabial fold: 3-year follow-up
evaluation." Aesthetic plastic surgery 32.5 (2008): 753-756.
[15] Heimowska, Aleksandra, Magda Morawska, and Anita Bocho-Janiszewska.
"Biodegradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) in natural water
environments." Polish Journal of Chemical Technology 19.1 (2017): 120-126.
[16] Moers‐Carpi, Marion Michaela, and Sally Sherwood.
"Polycaprolactone for the correction of nasolabial folds: A 24‐month,
prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial." Dermatologic Surgery
39.3pt1 (2013): 457-463.
Comments
Post a Comment